Sponsorship Appeal – Dependent or Adopted Child
When Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) refuses a Dependent or Adopted Child Sponsorship Application, families experience distress and separation. Fortunately, Canadian law provides sponsors with an important opportunity to contest the refusal — by filing an appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) to seek family reunification.
Call Us At
Sponsorship Appeal – Dependent or Adopted Child
Introduction
Canadian immigration policy places strong emphasis on the welfare of children, yet refusals still occur—often because of age cut-offs, custody disputes, or procedural missteps. The IAD offers sponsors a chance to correct the record and reunite with their children. This guide outlines legal definitions, strategic evidence, and advocacy considerations specific to child-focused appeals.
Who Counts as a “Child” under IRPR
- Dependent Child: Under 22 and unmarried/contactually single on the lock-in date (the day IRCC first received the permanent-residence application).
- Over-Age Dependants: Children 22 + who have depended on parents for financial support due to mental/physical condition and cannot be self-supporting.
- Adopted Child: Adoption must be legal, bona fide, and not primarily for immigration.
Frequent Refusal Scenarios
- Age Exceeded During Processing – Misinterpretation of lock-in rules.
- Custody or Guardianship Doubts – Missing consent letters from non-accompanying parents.
- Incomplete Medicals – Exams not uploaded or expired.
- Misrepresentation – Unreported siblings, falsified birth records.
- Adoption Genuineness – Perceived lack of emotional bond or short pre-adoption residency.
Timelines and Filing Mechanics
As with other family-class appeals, sponsors have 30 days to lodge the Notice. Given that many child cases involve foreign courts, translations, and expert reports, early engagement with counsel is advisable to ensure documents are sworn, certified, and filed on time.
Crafting an Effective Appeal
Lock-In Date Analysis
If IRCC deemed a child overage, supply proof of the application’s original receipt date and statutory interpretation of IRPR 4.1.
Custody Documentation
Provide court orders, notarised travel consents, or provincial adoption judgments. Where originals are impossible, sworn explanations under Kanthasamy v Canada principles can satisfy the IAD.
Best-Interests of the Child (BIOC)
The IAD must give “considerable weight” to BIOC. Support this with school reports, paediatric healthcare letters, mental-health assessments demonstrating emotional harm from separation, and evidence of community integration plans in Canada.
Humanitarian Factors
Include disruption to education, linguistic challenges, and country-specific risks (e.g., gender – based violence for adolescent girls).
Hearing Preparation
- Arrange interpreters familiar with child testimony if applicable.
- Prepare the minor (if testifying) on hearing etiquette, not on answers.
- Counsel should anticipate Minister’s questions on authenticity of documents and prepare objections to protect sensitive medical or family-law details.
Role of Counsel versus DIY
Translation certifications, Hague Apostille protocols, and cross-border custody law can trip up self-represented sponsors. Immigration Nation coordinates with foreign notaries, drafts evidence in line with IAD formatting, and ensures the Member receives a clear, child-centred narrative.
Conclusion
Children should not remain separated from their parents because of procedural errors or misunderstood regulations. The IAD appeal process provides a meaningful avenue to correct the record and prioritise the welfare of young dependants. For compassionate, results-oriented representation, reach out to Immigration Nation—your Edmonton immigration consultant dedicated to family reunification.
Need tailored help today?
Immigration Nation – Immigration Consultant Edmonton
📍 Suite 206, 9038 51 Ave NW 📞 (780) 800-0113 ✉️ [email protected]